I disagree with some of this, particularly regarding the looks of the QPVI and Ghibli. I agree the QPV is a fantastic looking car of its era - I own one. But car design has moved on and if Maserati we’re trying to still sell the QPV today they would sell very few. The Ghibli and QPVI are modern designs that meet the expectations of current new car buyers far better, as can be seen by the relative sales numbers. And as for anonymous, I don’t look out for the Ghibli or QPVI, but when one passes I notice it immediately. It absolutely stands out from the current mid-sized saloon crowd. The curve and power of the haunches, the general muscular look of the car, the aggression of the grille, all completely different to its universally bland competitors IMO.
Concerning, the Chrysler connection, yes there are a few buttons that may be shared and should have been better disguised to differentiate them, but overall the interior of a MY18 Ghibli is now a very nice place to be IMO - they have got very significantly better since the early cars. But again it’s more modern, whereas the QPV is quite old fashioned. Again, I own a QP5 and love the old school feel of the interior, but Maserati would sell few cars to current new buyers if they were building them now to look the same.
The point is they are different because they are from different eras. They have to be different because otherwise Maserati would be history. I understand that people with QPVs are likely to prefer their cars - that’s why they have them. But in assessing a current car you need to remove that inherent bias. If I was looking to buy a new 4 door saloon, I would definitely buy a Ghibli or QPVI, despite their minor “faults’, because they look different, drive different and sound different to the competitors in a way that I feel upholds their Maseratiness. And I like to be different to the crowd.