UlstermanAbroad
Member
- Messages
- 1,687
Apologies for stating the obvious. And since Russia has invaded again, I feel that a new thread is called for.
As I believe that we're in a whole new state of affairs now. 'Meanwhile on the Ukrainian Border' doesn't really cut it.
The US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, said on Meet the Press on Sunday. That if the Biden/Putin summit went ahead, then diplomacy still had a window of opportunity. He was categorical, when he said that if the summit didn't happen, Putin would invade.
So far, he's testing the response of the US and to a lesser extent, NATO. His real objective is to annexe all of Ukraine east of the Dnieper River. (at least) Effectively cutting the country in half. This secures his land corridor to Crimea and critically for a Georgian, this will also deter Georgia from pushing it's EU/NATO aspirations.
Once the dust settles, I would be concerned about Putin's agenda for Kaliningrad. Between Poland and Lithuania. So far as I can recall. There is a rail link between the city of Kaliningrad and Minsk (Belarus). Russia has always wanted to have a better land corridor into Kaliningrad and the Baltic Sea, since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
However, given Poland and Lithuania are NATO members, annexing a bigger land corridor is a much greater order of risk.
However, I would expect Putin to have a 'play book' of moves involving the use of gas supply in the autumn / winter of 2022/3.
For a Georgian President, 'losing' Ukraine and Georgia would have been an eternally embarrassing legacy to leave behind. An unsolved Kaliningrad issue. Not so much.
The question for Ukrainians now is not whether he'll invade. But whether he'll stop at the Dnieper River. Ukraine might've been able to slow a Russian advance on one front. But not from the East, South and North and that's probably what's going to happen, so that the advance can be over as quickly as possible. After which the Russians will hope that diplomacy will kick back in. Salami slicing. To an extent.