I always liked those. That looks nice, but again belt was done some time ago. Don't know what may raise its head if it started to see some reasonable use, but would be good to try.
Those late 90's Alfa 16v twin spark engined cars were fairly good
I'd say a nice late 145 Cloverleaf is the one to have!..If you can find one
Dave
I had two of those back in the day, as company cars, one in Blue and one in Black. Great for the twisty roads up here. I probably did about 150k miles in them over four years. Not everyone appreciated the styling back then though. I loved mine, and they were distinctive.Those late 90's Alfa 16v twin spark engined cars were fairly good
I'd say a nice late 145 Cloverleaf is the one to have!..If you can find one
Dave
JTS are rubbish in comparison of the TS.
The JTS was an attempt to get some sort of fuel economy out of the TS unit...where in the problem was owners where simply trashing them as it was such an involving power band.
All that happened is they didn't rev like the TS and were very poor IMHO.
Only taking about the 2L engine TS vs JTS, the Phase 3 body yes, all the way.The phase 2 TS looks awful and dated these days . The engine was better though. I would still get a phase 3 2l . Slightly reduced preformance but a much nicer looking car inside and out . If you are going for a V6 then a phase3 3.2 all the way
Only taking about the 2L engine TS vs JTS, the Phase 3 body yes, all the way.