Are you worried yet.

Status
Not open for further replies.

mjheathcote

Centenary Club
Messages
9,038
Imagine you were born in 1900.

When you're 14, World War I begins and ends when you're 18 with 22 million dead.

Soon after a global pandemic, the Spanish Flu, appears, killing 50 million people. And you're alive and 20 years old.

When you're 29 you survive the global economic crisis that started with the collapse of the New York Stock Exchange, causing inflation, unemployment and famine.

When you're 33 years old the nazis come to power.

When you're 39, World War II begins and ends when you're 45 years old with a 60 million dead. In the Holocaust 6 million Jews die.

When you're 52, the Korean War begins.
When you're 64, the Vietnam War begins and ends when you're 75.

A child born in 1985 thinks his grandparents have no idea how difficult life is, but they have survived several wars and catastrophes.

Today we have all the comforts in a new world, amid a new pandemic. But we complain because we need to wear masks. We complain because we must stay confined to our homes where we have food, electricity, running water, wifi, even Netflix! None of that existed back in the day. But humanity survived those circumstances and never lost their joy of living.

A small change in our perspective can generate miracles. We should be thankful that we are alive. We should do everything we need to do to protect and help each other.

This message should reach everyone. Please help me spread it.

Both my grandparents on my Dad's side where born in 1900, my Dad being the youngest born in 1941.
My Grandfather passed away in '76 and my Grandmother in '87.
It seems strange that I do have many memories of them and it was 120 years ago when they were both born.
 
Last edited:

doodlebug

Member
Messages
917
Both my grandparents on my Dad's side where born in 1900, my Dad being the youngest born in 1941.
My Grandfather passed away in '76 and my Grandmother in '87.
It seems strange that I do have many memories of them and it was 120 years ago when they where both born.
Both of my paternal grandparents were born before 1890. I remember my paternal grandmother very well; she lived with us and died when I was 25. My paternal Grandfather died when I was 2 but I have no recollection of him. I also remember very well my maternal-Great-Grandmother who also was born before 1890. I freely admit I'm very, very old but these numbers scare me a bit. My Great-Granddad died at Monte Cassino and my Grandad's brother (his son) died at Ypres. It is strange I remember most of them so clearly but it was such a long time ago.
 

MarkMas

Chief pedant
Messages
8,961
Apologies MarkMas, did u mean “my” post.
When I read yours it sounded like you were excusing govt etc for the chaos.....
perhaps I didn’t take it as it was intended.

Sorry, Wattie - I have only just realised you were asking about a typo in my post. Yes, "by" should have been "my". Now your comment makes more sense to me!
 

MarkMas

Chief pedant
Messages
8,961
Surely the point is it's self evident that the masks made no sense for a woodwind player, and hence the ridicule? I'd certainly not go down the coercion line but I would look very askance at anyone that actually suggested that this might be a sensible thing, and then, beyond that, attempted to test it. There appears to have been no logical examination of any theoretical benefits before jumping into to a practical test.

Having said that, you're normally a reasonable chap, so interested to hear your take.

C

You are right, of course, that it was pretty self-evident that an actual trial was unnecessary. I guess my point is that all sorts of people do mildly unnecessary or stupid things all the time, and it seems to me that an appropriate response is "meh", rather than some sort of self-righteous outrage. While I'm not immune from the odd rant myself, I don't think it is healthy to spend a lot of time yelling, "Look! Look! Someone is doing something that I think is stupid, or that offends my preconceptions." But other people seem to think that it is somehow amusing, useful or cathartic, so, er, "meh".
 

Nayf

Member
Messages
2,752
You are right, of course, that it was pretty self-evident that an actual trial was unnecessary. I guess my point is that all sorts of people do mildly unnecessary or stupid things all the time, and it seems to me that an appropriate response is "meh", rather than some sort of self-righteous outrage. While I'm not immune from the odd rant myself, I don't think it is healthy to spend a lot of time yelling, "Look! Look! Someone is doing something that I think is stupid, or that offends my preconceptions." But other people seem to think that it is somehow amusing, useful or cathartic, so, er, "meh".
I view people’s apoplectic rage because someone’s posted a picture of a car with an illegal number plate in a similar way. It’s as if there are 100 internet points on offer for the engorged zealot determined to point out that the spacing is not as it should be. Almost any other motoring misdeed in the eyes of the law is given a pass, short of rampantly dangerous/drink driving. But someone with a non standard numberplate? Worst crime imaginable... just what do they hope to achieve? I think, think, think the owner of the car with the dodgy plate might just know. Not that I condone it, just feel the keyboard warrior stuff is unnecessary - when I know those commentating certainly don’t stick to speed limits...


Then again, I get apoplexy when I see disabled spots being parked in by cars curiously devoid of blue badges. These disabled spots are often largely empty so no-one is really harmed, but when I see a clearly able-bodied chap in a Range Rover using two spots...
 

Wattie

Member
Messages
8,640
Why less than half the population will be vaccinated against Covid-19
Only around 30m people will be inoculated, says head of vaccine task force
Read in inews: https://apple.news/AXND3Y0XaTuypaDf1X1W0Tw

Ms Bingham- Head of the Vaccine Task force

“Stressing that it was “not going to happen”, she explained that less than half of the UK population – around 30m out of 67m – would be covered as a vaccination programme would be targeted at vulnerable and older groups which can find it harder to beat the virus.”

She also said,

“In terms of the balance between risk and benefit, it could even be more dangerous to inoculate healthy people because a jab “could cause them some freak harm”.

What?????
You’re not going to give it to healthy people cause it could be “even more dangerous” but you’ll give it to “vulnerable and older groups”.

How are they gonna be protected from this “freak harm”......isn’t it gonna be even more dangerous for them!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.