No more or less than I would about reporting any crime regardless of race, orientation or any other factor... the fact is that there is a 99.6% likelyhood of it being handled by staff who have not been predisposed.
And that is a logical position to take.
But when you read how the Met Police have institutionally failed to address this behaviour, you might not think 99.6% of officers are not predisposed, that it is part of a wider boys club mentality.
Remember, this is the same police force which broke up a peaceful vigil over the murder of Sarah Everard and protest against wider sexual violence in society.
I am not an advocate for setting targets for sexual offence convictions; the statistics show that stranger rapes (as portrayed in Brookside back in the 1986 as one of the first portrayals of sexual violence on television) make up a smaller proportion of sexual offences - most cases involve the parties knowing each other. Nuance, parties' mutual understanding, communication of consent are all important considerations as are the tired tropes such as "she was asking for it", "look at the way she dresses", "she's a tease", a victim's sexual history.
But if you were a girl or woman who had been attacked, do you think these considerations would play on your mind?