So this is classic forum behaviour. Because I might be in the minority here, I can't tout my no need to get an inspection line as much as the get an inspection line?
whenever someone disagrees on the internet, rather than have reasoned conversational debate over a topic, the majority party tries to shut it down with "just leave it".
I'm not sorry if this upsets anyone, but this is the first time I've come across where so many people are focused on pre purchase inspections on a one brand forum.
The world is different. Buying a car using distance selling overs hugely more benefit than this "traditional" route. Your money is protected, you can still get discounts and you have much more time to drive, check and inspect the car at your leisure.
People seem oblivious to the fact I've put my car on a ramp 5 times since I have bought it and 4 of those within the first 14 days.
I haven't got where I am or do what I do because I'm an idiot, and I'm not implying other people are either, but just because the forum opinion of mine does not go with the status quo then it shouldn't be silenced. It should be embraced as an alternative option.
Who is in a more advantageous position? The person with the ultimate right and legal backing to return a motor with 14 days for a full refund or the one who has had it inspected, and something goes wrong in the same time? You have to fight with the dealer for "fit for purpose, and that is a fight, and the fact you had it inspected means you were informed and educated on the car, all of a sudden, it weakens the position.
Buying a car using distance selling gives you options. Those options you can explore relatively cost free.
So OP - sorry you thread has been hi-jacked, congratulations on exploring Maseratis. I still think the inspection was an unnecessary risk, when you could have had the car delivered and from a position of strength negotiated when you hold all the aces.